Sheriff in AZ States that Obama Has Ceded an 80 Mile Strip of the Border to Armed Drug Gangs

I do not think this has been covered in the MSM. Certainly no member of the press has publicly questioned Obama or Napolitano about it. If the situation is as reported by this sheriff, it sounds like gross dereliction of duty. And it is such a bizarro world scene: it seems to be cool with Obama for foreigners here only to break the law to carry weapons but he is very uncomfortable with a law abiding American citizen having a weapon. I can't quite get my mind around the moral nuances involved in this little nightmare. I wonder if this is all a part of creating that future whose looks he cannot picture. I live in Southern California and I am beginning to wonder if Obama will give us ample warning before he gives us back to Mexico. Strangely the FEC did not look into the sources of the nearly billion dollars in campaign funds Obama received. I have to wonder how much of it was a down payment on our South West from Mexico.


h/t: Carol's Closet via Pundit and Pundette

‘OTM’: LAX BORDER SECURITY OPENS DOORS TO POTENTIAL TERRORISTS

.

h/t: Breitbart TV

Today's 'Impervious to Reality' Award Goes to Chris Matthews who Still Thinks Obama's One of Our Smartest Presidents

Matthews just can't understand why someone would criticize a president as smart as Obama. I am sure history will not remember Obama as particularly intelligent. He might be remembered as the president who made Nixon look honest by comparison or the president who did the most for our enemies and the least for our allies. There are enough questionable issues that might end up in an Obama impeachment. Strangely, Matthews keeps asking what problem Obama's critics could have with his approach to terrorism. I think that we are under threat from people would like to kill us and will if they get a chance. I do not have a sense that Obama sees it that way. I think that Obama is OK with Americans dying as long as no one says anything that any Muslim is uncomfortable with hearing. I am convinced that if he took the real threats that exist serious he would not leave our borders wide open and he would not have someone as incompetent as Napolitano in charge of DHS. By keeping Napolitano there he is effectively saying, "Keep setting bombs and shooting people because I won't fire Janet until she makes me look like a complete idiot."

h/t: Newsbusters

Napolitano Asleep at the Switch

***


h/t: NewsBusters

Is the Border Secure? Napolitano Answers, "That Is An Unfair Question'

This woman needs to replaced with someone who will not play politics with national security. Meanwhile, the president is in another part of the country blatantly lying about the Arizona immigration law in a cheap stunt to get a few votes.

"I'll Talk with Anyone Who Agrees with Me" Might Not Be the Absolutely Best Start on Bipartinship

Something groundbreaking happenrd yesterday. The post-partisan, transparency via CSPAN president got together with the other party in front of the CSPAN cameras. As we are painfully learning there is not a 100% agreement between what President Obama says and what he means. “I am post-partisan and believe in transparency,” actually means, “I will listen to the other party and open up to the public only if absolutely nothing else short of declaring martial law will get me what I want.” When he says, “I will accept responsibility,” what he means is, “I will tell you which Republican to blame.” Fair enough, now that we know we just need to make a 175 degree correction of everything he says and we have a clear clue as to what he will do.
Job creation and deficit reduction were major topics in the president’s discussion with the opposition party. But I felt frustrated that the important item facing our nation was not addressed. Muslim militants continue to launch operations to kill large numbers of Americans. No one has yet told Barack Obama or Janet Napolitano about this ever looming threat. Out national security team is asleep. They will remain asleep if it is up to Obama and J-Nap. We need congress to put some pressure on the White House to get its national security act together. There is little or no chance of that pressure coming from any Democrats in Congress. So the Republicans need to get it together. Our confused president has been allowed to set the agenda so everything is off balance.
In spite of all his big talk about bipartisanship Obama has really never tried it. So he needs help. Maybe someone needs to explain to him that saying you’re open to input followed by ideological attacks on most any input does not always cause you opponent to agree with you immediately. But he is really new at this. Maybe he just needs patience and understanding. A LOT of patience and understanding.

Janet Napolitano Still Has A Job?? And It's in National Security?? So I CAN Be A Runway Model Afterall

****************************************************


h/t: JammieWearingFool

This woman is probably the most palpable symbol of Obama's total failure. Her continuance in office is proof that the physical safety of American citizens is of no concern to Barack Obama.
And she should wipe that sickening, psychotropically induced smile off her face.

Obama Does Not Care If Undie Bomber and Ft. Hood Are Repeated. How Do I Know? Janet Napolitano Still Has A Job.

*******************************************************

Security Kabuki


h/t: Michelle Malkin.comm

If the Goal Is to Bring Terrorists, Guns, Bombs Army Bases and Air Liners Together Then, Yes, the System Is working Fine

**************************************************
Below are two quotes from Ann Coulter's most recent column.

The "warning signs" exhibited by this particular passenger included the following:

His name was Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.

He's Nigerian.

He's a Muslim.

His name was Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.

He boarded a plane in Lagos, Nigeria.

He paid nearly $3,000 in cash for his ticket.

He had no luggage.

His name was Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.

Two months ago, his father warned the U.S. that he was a radical Muslim and possibly dangerous.

If our security procedures can't stop this guy, can't we just dispense with those procedures altogether? What's the point exactly?

. . . . . . . . . . . .

he government is like the drunk looking for his keys under a lamppost. Someone stops to help, and asks, "Is this where you lost them?" No, the drunk answers, but the light's better here.
The government refuses to perform the only possibly effective security check -- search Muslims -- so instead it harasses infinitely compliant Americans. Will that help avert a terrorist attack? No, but the Americans don't complain.